I suggest my readers download and review a copy as the manual really is a great handy resource for any type of litigation, especially in the Federal Court of Australia. Legg; Travers L, 2009, “Necessity is the mother of invention – the adoption of third party litigation funding and the closed class in australian class actions”, Common Law World Review, volume 38, p. 245 – 267 Legg MJ, 2014, “High Court of Australia uses case management and `overarching purpose` to resolve disputes over the eroneous provision of privileged documents in disclosure”, Civil Justice Quarterly, Volume 33, p. 115 This requires, among other things, rewriting existing chapters and writing new, expanded content. The revision of the manual is an important project that will take some time. Although this revision is ongoing, you should be aware that not all chapters of the manual reflect the new practical advice. The existing chapters still contain useful commentary on the principles of case management, but since they were written prior to the introduction of the new framework, they should be read in this light. Legg M, 2018, “New Skills for New Lawyers: Responding to Technology and Practice Developments,” in Lindgren K; Kunc F; Coper M (ed.), The Future of Australian Legal Education, Lawbook Co, Pyrmont, Australia, legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/the-future-of-australian-legal-education/productdetail/126538 The Federal Litigation and Dispute Resolution Section of the Law Council of Australia is pleased to publish the Case Management Manual of the Federal Court of Australia. This initiative is the result of a close and ongoing link between the Court of Justice and the Section, as well as ongoing workshops and discussions on the best approaches to the management of cases pending before the Court. Justice Emmerig; Slade B; Legg M, 2014, “Representative Proceedings – Class Actions”, in Case Management Handbook, www.lawcouncil.asn.au/federal-litigation-dispute-resolution/fldrs-publications/case-management-handbook Following reforms to the national judicial framework in 2016, the Law Council of Australia and the Federal Court are working together to revise the Law Council Handbook. Once completed, the updated manual will take into account the Court`s new national practice guides, as well as any other relevant guides and forms that have changed practice and procedure at the Federal Supreme Court.

A link to the press release and manual can be found here. Mention should also be made of the Honourable Justice Michelle Gordon AC (now a judge of the High Court of Australia), who was a driving force behind the Court`s innovative approaches to more effective case management. The encouragement of your honor was crucial to the development of the manual. The Law Council of Australia has just published a handbook for the management of cases and hearings before the Federal Court of Australia. The 79-page manual draws on the experience of the Law Council of Australia, senior practitioners and the judiciary to provide a user-friendly guide to conducting cases in federal courts. The Handbook is not intended to be a comprehensive treatment of practice and procedure in the Court of Justice, nor to replace existing work on federal civil procedure or evidence. Second, it is not intended to undermine the individual system of rules or to restrict the discretion of judges in the conduct of case management. Legg M; gottlieb I, 2019, “The AMP Competing Class Actions: From Five to One,” Australian Law Journal, volume 93, p. 817 – 820, sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/2019/10/14/australian-law-journal-update-vol-93-pt-10/ The Federal Court Business Management Manual of the Legal Council of Australia is a very important development in the ongoing dialogue between the Federal Court of Australia and the legal profession that exercises before it the best way to deal with cases before the Court.

It contains a wealth of information, guidelines, ideas and suggestions on the instruments and techniques available to the Court. It brings together the experience of judges and practitioners. Rather, it is based on the conviction that a particular advantage of the procedure before the Court is that, as a general rule, each case is dealt with from beginning to end by the judge deciding it, the Court and the parties being able to take into account the circumstances of the case from the outset.